People v. Engert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress the written statement that he gave to police. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record reflects that he was given his Miranda warnings twice before he voluntarily waived those rights and gave his statement to the police. We conclude that defendant was not subject to continuous interrogation so as to render the warnings ineffective (see, People v Chappie, 38 NY2d 112; People v Salem, 167 AD2d 840, lv denied 77 NY2d 911). The record also discloses that defendant made…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. LugoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GuthrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.