Legal Opinion

Kopplin v. Quade

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tlie county court of Jefferson county: Ci-iaeles B. Rog-ebs, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBabees, J.

On September 14, 1901, the plaintiff was the owner of a thoroughbred Holstein-Friesian heifer which was born on January 8, 1906, and had been thereafter duly christened “Martha Pietertje Pauline.” The name is neither euphonious nor musical, but there isn’t much in a name anyway. Shakespeare (W.), Borneo and Juliet, act II, scene 2. Notwithstanding any handicap she may have had in the way of a cognomen, Martha Pietertje Pauline was a genuine *455“highbrow,” having a pedigree as long and at least as well | authenticated as that of the ordinary scion of effete European! nobility who breaks into this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beebe v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McNamer v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Matthews v. LanghoferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Hall v. UmikerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Coffman v. NieceMontana Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API