Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Niece

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1940No. 8,009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note dated February 5, 1927, in the principal sum of $750, alleged to have been executed by defendants, as husband and wife, and delivered to Empire Cattle Company and by it sold to plaintiff. Defendant Mary Niece filed a general denial. O. R. Niece answered, admitting the execution of the note by him, and denying the other allegations of the complaint. By way of affirmative defense he alleged that at the time of the execution of the note he purchased from Empire Cattle Company sixty head of purebred Hereford calves, paying therefor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Helena National Bank v. Rocky Mountain Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Outlook Farmers' Elevator Co. v. American Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Billings Realty Co. v. Big Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coffman v. NieceMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dawson County v. HagenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API