Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Langhofer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1921No. 23,182PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Edwards district court; Albert S. Fotjlks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Damages were sought by plaintiff in this action because the defendant had allowed a scrub bull to run at large, enter his pasture, where thoroughbred heifers about thirteen months old were kept, with the result that seven of them were gotten with calf and these calves, it was claimed, were only worth $15, whereas thoroughbred calves would have been worth $150. The breeding occurred as was alleged and shown when the heifers were about thirteen months old and it is asserted that they should not have been bred until they were nearly two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Washington & Idaho Railroad Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Leroy & Western Railway Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Anderson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Hurley v. PainterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Bryant v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Ewing v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API