Legal Opinion

Henley v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1953No. Civ. 19674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The within appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of the respondent executrix, for refund of state income taxes, paid under protest, for the years 1938, 1939, 1940 and 1941. The case involves two different claims for refund, namely, credit on the California tax of a 5 per cent Canadian income tax on dividends paid by a Canadian corporation which neither did business in, nor had an office or agent in California; and a deduction for accounting expenses incurred in connection with management of personal investments.

Under section 17976 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (formerly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. AldrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Estate of BoggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keyes v. CHAMBERSOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. NeillIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Burnham v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API