Legal Opinion

Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1960No. Civ. 18363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant denying them a refund of personal income taxes.

Questions Presented

1. Was the Canadian income tax paid by California residents on corporate dividends a “net income tax” under section 18001 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (formerly § 17976)?

2. Is section 18001 unconstitutional ?

Record

The facts were stipulated. Plaintiffs during the years 1949-1953, inclusive, owned stock in a Canadian corporation which engaged in no business in Californa and all of whose property and activity was in Canada. Plaintiffs at all times were residing and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. First Unitarian Church v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Department of Revenue v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Burnham v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willingham Bus Lines, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cohan v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Tetreault v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. MCA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API