Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant denying them a refund of personal income taxes.
Questions Presented
1. Was the Canadian income tax paid by California residents on corporate dividends a “net income tax” under section 18001 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (formerly § 17976)?
2. Is section 18001 unconstitutional ?
Record
The facts were stipulated. Plaintiffs during the years 1949-1953, inclusive, owned stock in a Canadian corporation which engaged in no business in Californa and all of whose property and activity was in Canada. Plaintiffs at all times were residing and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- First Unitarian Church v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Department of Revenue v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Burnham v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Willingham Bus Lines, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Cohan v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Tetreault v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- MCA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.