State v. Kiefer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Buchanan District Court. — Hon. C. W. Mullan, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of cheating by false pretenses and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1' andICinfotmamenV: fStaf ownership" of fafieerpretenses. I. The accused is charged in the indictment with having'obtained, by false pretenses, a promissory note of $700, bearing date February 15, 1913, and due six months after date, executed by D. B. Stoner to the defendant, and $700 in money. The ownership of this property is not alleged save by implication; and, as an indictment cannot be aided by intendment (State v. Ashpole, 127 Iowa 680), and ownership must be averred (State v. Clark, 141 Iowa 297), the county attorney filed an amendment adding the following:
“That the money and notes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bates v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. FoxtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KieferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- State v. BogardusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- State v. BrundageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- State v. RenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.