Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson District Court. — IIon. D. M. Anderson, Judge. Indictment for cheating by false pretenses. " Trial to a jury, and verdict of guilty. Motion for a new trial overruled, and from the judgment entered on the verdict the defendant has appealed. —

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J. —

1. Grand juries: member of election board: disqualification. 1. The appellant moved to set aside the indictment because of the alleged disqualification of three grand jurors upon the panel from which was drawn the grand jury by which the indictment was returned. The statute (Code Supp. 1907, sec£jon 337) makes it the duty of election boards to certify that the jury lists returned by them do not contain the name of any person who directly or indirectly requested to be included therein. It is shown in the record that upon the full panel of grand jurors drawn for the year in question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. State v. WassonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. State v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API