Hall v. City Park Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellee was incorporated for the purpose of manufacturing and selling malt and malt liquors, and dealing generally in real and personal estate necessary for the successful prosecution of that business. After the adoption of the Eighteenth Amendment and the passage of the Volstead Act in October, 1919, the company endeavored to manufacture and sell malt beverages which conformed to the provisions of the law, but the effort met with a heavy financial loss and the enterprise proved a failure. It then attempted to manufacture malt extracts. A separate corporation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Malone v. Lancaster Gas Light & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Noble v. Gadsden Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Garland v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Phinizy v. Anniston City Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tower Hill-Connellsville Coke Co. of West Virginia v. Piedmont Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Tate v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.