Legal Opinion

State v. Clemente-Perez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 2014No. D104733M; A147753PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 166.250.1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was insufficient evidence that he was within a vehicle when he possessed a firearm and, alternatively, that there was uncontroverted evidence that he was entitled to possess the firearm because it was in his place of residence. We affirm.

In reviewing a denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state and review those facts to determine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. TeglandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API