State v. Clemente-Perez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 166.250.1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was insufficient evidence that he was within a vehicle when he possessed a firearm and, alternatively, that there was uncontroverted evidence that he was entitled to possess the firearm because it was in his place of residence. We affirm.
In reviewing a denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state and review those facts to determine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. TeglandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015