Legal Opinion

In re the Discipline of an Attorney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 20, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This bar discipline case requires us to determine the appropriate sanction for the respondent attorney where the Board of Bar Overseers (board) recommended that he receive an admonition. Bar counsel objected to the recommended discipline, and the board filed an information with the county court pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 4:01, § 8 (4), as appearing in 425 Mass. 1309 (1997). A single justice of this court reserved and reported the case without decision. We conclude that an admonition is warranted.

1. We summarize the findings of fact made by the hearing committee and adopted by the board, many of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. In the Matter of the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. In re FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. In the Matter of PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. German v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. In re McBrideMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. In the Matter of StraussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. In the Matter of FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API