German v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
We are called upon to pass on the constitutionality of St. 1991, c. 6, § 90, the so-called “furlough” law. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether § 90 imposes a discriminatory and unconstitutional graduated “tax” on State, employees, and whether it effects a governmental “taking” of the plaintiff’s property without reasonable compensation in violation of art. 10 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. We determine that § 90 does not impose a “tax” on State employees. Furthermore, § 90 does not deprive the plaintiff State employee of any property right and, therefore, does not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- McCarthy v. Sheriff of Suffolk CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boston Medical Center Corp. v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health & Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Caesars Massachusetts Management Co. v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Michigan Soft Drink Ass'n v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re SilvermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.