Clackamas County v. Holmes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
In this equity proceeding brought by Clackamas County the trial court enjoined defendants from completing the construction of a chicken processing plant on the principal ground that such a plant would be in violation of the county zoning ordinance. ① On appeal defendants contend:(1) The applicable county zoning ordinances were invalid because they were vague and failed to provide property owners with adequate notice of the intended zoning; and(2) Even if the ordinances were valid, the defendants have a right to use the property as a chicken processing plant because they established a prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Vedovell v. City of NorthlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Town of Hempstead v. LynneNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- County of Winnebago v. CannellIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Washington County v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Twin Rocks Watseco Defense Committee v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Clackamas County v. Portland City TempleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Lane County v. BessettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Union Oil Co. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.