Moss v. Golden Rule Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
In this action to recover benefits under a group major medical policy, the insurance company defended on the grounds that a material misrepresentation was made as to the insured’s weight in the application, which increased the risk but, assuming coverage, the insured was only entitled to recover the difference between the major medical benefits established in the policy and what was paid or payable by Medicare, since the insured was over age 65. The trial judge submitted as issues of fact to a jury whether the pertinent policy provisions were ambiguous and whether a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paul v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Parker v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Union Planters Corp. v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BattsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- NSA DBA Benefit Plan, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Northland Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Methodist Healthcare v. American International Specialty Line InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.