Parker v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
The plaintiff, Edgar Parker, seeks to recover from the defendant, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, the benefits provided under a group insurance policy for the loss of a leg. The plaintiff contends that he accidentally stepped upon a nail that penetrated his shoe causing a puncture wound of his foot and eventually the amputation of his leg after gangrene developed from the wound. The defendant argues that the loss is excluded from coverage under the policy. The Chancellor tried the case without a jury and found the issues in favor of the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Gage v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Omer M. Harris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Britton v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Naifeh v. Valley Forge Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Angus v. Western Heritage Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Holland-America Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Black v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Michael Lancaster v. Ferrell Paving, Inc. v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.