Legal Opinion

Dougan & Sheftall v. Dunham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 22, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Seabrook. Chatham superior court. December 17, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

1. The correctness of an account can not be lawfully proved by the testimony of a witness that the same is “ a correct copy of the charges made on the books ” kept by her, when the witness further testifies that “ she knew nothing of her own knowledge” with respect to the account, and “only copied in the book entries given to her by [another] on slips.”

2. ■ As the magistrate erred in admitting against the defendants illegal testimony which was necessarily prejudicial to them, the superior court erred in not sustaining their petition for certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. McQueenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Linder v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Swift v. Oglesby & SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BinnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API