Castagno v. Lavine Express
New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau
1Opinion of the Court
A formal petition having been filed claiming compensation under and by virtue of the Workmen’s Compensation act of the State of New Jersey, with supplements thereto and amendments thereto; and an answer having been filed and the parties having appeared before me this 18th day of July, 1934, and having heard the facts and circumstances relating thereto, I, John C. Wegner, a deputy commissioner of New Jersey, do hereby find and determine as follows:
1. That the petitioner was employed by the respondent as a helper on an automobile truck and that on March SSd, 1934, his duties consisted of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Higgins v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LiebSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Amarone v. BrennanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Railway Express Agency v. WootenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944