Legal Opinion

Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 11, 2017No. 078294PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson

In this appeal, the Court considers an employee’s agreement at the inception of his employment to prospectively waive third-party claims against his employer’s customers, in the event that he were to sustain injuries in a workplace accident at a customer’s facility.

Plaintiff Philip Vitale was hired by Allied Barton Security Services (Allied Barton) as a security guard. When it hired Vitale, Allied Barton required him to execute an agreement entitled “Worker’s Comp Disclaimer” (Disclaimer) as a condition of his employment. In the Disclaimer, Vitale agreed to “waive and forever release any and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Rudbart v. North Jersey District Water Supply CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bove v. Akpharma Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  2. Universal N. Am. Ins. Co. v. Bridgepointe Condo. Ass'n, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. Amy Skuse v. Pfizer, Inc. (082509)(Mercer County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
  4. CHARLES L. BOVE VS. AKPHARMA INC. (L-0982-15, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. CRESPO v. SKILLSOFT (US) LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API