Stanley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Appellant Nationwide has violated Rule 28(b)(5), Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it failed to set out its argument in its brief in the form of questions immediately followed by a reference to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the questions. By application of Rule 28, Nationwide has abandoned its entire appeal. However, due to the serious questions presented on appeal and the brevity of the record, we are persuaded, in the interest of justice and in our discretion, as permitted by Rule 2, Rules of Appellate Procedure, to waive the error under Rule 28.
Defend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Jernigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Naylor v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Packer v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strader v. Sunstates Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Belasco v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- INS. CO. OF N. AMER. v. Aetna Life & Cas.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987