Legal Opinion

L. E. Whitham Co. v. Kemp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1933No. 7909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellant, a partnership composed of L. E. and B. M. Whitham, sued appellees on paving certificates issued to it by the city of San Angelo for paving the street in front of ap-pellees’ property in said city and for a foreclosure of their paving lien. Appellees defended only against foreclosure of the lien on the ground that said property was their homestead. Trial was to the court, who found, after a hearing, that all of said property was appellees’ homestead, denied appellant a foreclosure of the asserted lien, but gave it judgment for its debt. From this judgment the paving…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Jones v. First Nat. Bank of McAllenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Harston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Jolesch & Chaska Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Guajardo De GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Continental Inv. Co. v. SchmeichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. East Texas Refining Co. v. Helvir Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API