Legal Opinion

Jolesch & Chaska Co. v. Hampton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1927No. 527PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

Suit by appellant to recover of appellee $1,532.81, and an attach'ment was issued and levied upon, among other property, 72 acres of land as the property of appellee, R. E. Hampton. Appellee answered, among other defenses, claiming said 72 acres attached was his homestead, and therefore not subject to attachment. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for appellant for $1,532.81 and a foreclosure of the attachment -on certain property, but denying, a foreclosure of the attachment lien' on the 72 acres, the court holding same was exempt to appellee as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gouhenant v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Gardner v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cross v. EvertsTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Shepherd v. CassidayTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Freiberg, Klein & Co. v. WalzemTexas Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re MitchellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1987
  2. Simank v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Stevenson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Romo v. Montemayor (In re Montemayor)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Miller v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API