Legal Opinion

Jones v. First Nat. Bank of McAllen

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1924No. 501-3916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The First National Bank of McAllen, defendant in error, filed suit in the district court against plaintiffs in error on a promissory note and to foreclose an attachment lien on lot 11 and the east 4½ acres of lot 12 in the northeast quarter of section 8 of Hidalgo Canal Company’s subdivision of its lands in porciones 64, 65, and 66 in Hidalgo county, Tex. Plaintiffs in error alleged that said land was their homestead, and not subject to foreclosure under attachment sued out by defendant in error. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in' a judgment in favor of defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George Wilder & Co. v. McConnellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bull v. ConroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Posey v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Taylor v. BoulwareTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. L. H. Lauchheimer & Sons v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fajkus v. First National Bank of GiddingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. In the Matter of Corinne N. Cannady, Debtor. Corinne N. Cannady, Cross-Appellees v. Robert B. Wilson, Trustee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Gates v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Schultz v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Boerner v. Cicero Smith Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API