Legal Opinion

Blum v. Rogers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1890No. 3180PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Hopkins. Tried below before Hon. E. W. Terhune.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—This is the third appeal in this case. The opinion upon the first appeal was not reported. That upon the second will be found in 71 Texas, 668. The suit involves the title to certain lots in the town of Sulphur Springs which were sold under execution *531against appellee and were bid in by appellant and conveyed to him by the sheriff.

Appellee and wife brought this suit to cancel the sheriff’s deed, upon the grounds, first, that the property was paid for with the separate funds of the wife, and was in equity her separate estate; and second, that the lots sold and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medlenka v. DowningTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Autry v. ReasorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mays v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Lasseter v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Blackwell v. LasseterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API