Legal Opinion
Rai v. Barclays Capital Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 15, 2010No. 10 Civ. 1675(SAS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Guya Singh Rai petitions the Court to vacate a final award (the “Petition”) entered in favor of Barclays Capital Inc. (“Barclays”) in an arbitration proceeding between the two parties (the “Proceeding”). Rai contends that the Arbitration Panel erred in “refusing to postpone the hearing,” 1 excluding “evidence pertinent and material to the controversy,” 2 and failing to give a reasoned basis for its decision. 3 Rai also contends the Panel was biased. 4 Barclays cross-petitions to con firm the arbitration award. For the reasons…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oracle Corp. v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- First Capital Real Estate Invs., L.L.C. v. SDDCO Brokerage Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- New York Central Lines, LLC v. VitaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Research & Development Center "teploenergetika," LLC v. EP International, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.