Legal Opinion
Himmel v. City Council of Burlingame
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1959No. Civ. 17691PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The notice of appeal states: “Plaintiffs are appealing all rulings, orders, and judgments, interlocutory or final, which in any way, or to any degree are adverse to the interests of the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action. Particular reference is made to proceedings in the above-entitled case of May 18, 1956 and March 16, 1956.” *
Questions Presented
1. May a corporation sue in propria persona?
2. After motion to strike complaint granted, may complaint be amended without leave of court ?
Record
May 16, 1955, complaint for injunction and petition for alternative writ of mandate and/or writ of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- A. Victor & Co. v. SleiningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by13 opinions
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Johnson v. Hayes Cal Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Vann v. ShillehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.