Legal Opinion
Qwest Communications Corp. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 16, 2008No. Civil Action RWT 07-2199PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.
On August 17, 2007, Qwest Communications Corporation (“Qwest”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Relief against the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission (“M-NCPPC” or “the Commission”). The Complaint alleges that Qwest is a company that provides telecommunication services in Maryland, and that in “order to provide these services, it locates its telecommunications facilities on Commission property.” Compl. ¶ 1. The Complaint does not describe the nature of the telecommunications services provided by Qwest in Maryland 1 and does…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Qwest Communications Corp. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009