Legal Opinion

Qwest Communications Corp. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 18, 2009No. Case 07CV2199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.

On August 17, 2007, Plaintiff Qwest Communications Corporation (“Qwest”) filed its original complaint against the Defendant, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (“Commission”). In that complaint, Qwest sought a declaration that a proposed license agreement demanded by the Commission for the use of a right-of-way in Little Falls Park, as well as the compensation proposed under that agreement, were preempted under the Federal Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 253. The complaint also requested declaratory relief concerning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York State Thruway Authority v. Level 3 Communications, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API