Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Chisholm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1928No. Docket No. 176, Calendar No. 33,725PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Section 1 of chapter 37 of Act No. 319, Pub. Acts 1927, entitled:

“An act to provide a system of public instruction and primary schools; to provide for the classification, organization, regulation and maintenance of schools and school districts; to prescribe their rights, powers, duties and privileges; to prescribe penalties for violations of the provisions of this act; and to repeal all acts inconsistent herewith,”

by its terms repeals Act No. 174, Pub. Acts 1915 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5767 et seq.), commonly called “the teachers’ pension act.” Defendants are members .of the board created by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Westgate v. Township of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brown v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ladd v. Motor City Plastics Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API