Legal Opinion
Ladd v. Motor City Plastics Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2013No. Docket No. 303018PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
Plaintiff David C. Ladd appeals by right the circuit court’s order (1) denying his motion for amount due on judgment and contempt sanctions, (2) determining that garnishee United Bank & Trust (“UBT” or “the bank”) was not required to actually exercise its claimed right of setoff against the deposit accounts of defendant Motor City Plastics Company (“Motor City”), (3) determining that UBT followed proper procedures and was not in contempt, and (4) denying UBT’s request for attorney fees. UBT cross-appeals the same order. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Following trial in the underlying…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- 1300 Lafayette East Cooperative, Inc v. SavoyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bearing360 LLC v. Larry CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bearing360 LLC v. Larry CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- City of Detroit v. Nationwide Recovery IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.