Legal Opinion

Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2013No. Docket No. 314048PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by right the trial court’s order holding 2011 PA 264 unconstitutional because it violates Const 1963, art 11, § 5. 2011 PA 264 amended the State Employees’ Retirement Act (SERA), MCL 38.1 et seq. Plaintiffs challenged those changes that required employees hired before April 1,1997, who had maintained membership in the state pension system (the “defined benefit pension plan” or “DB plan”) to choose either to contribute 4 percent of their income to that plan or to switch to the 401(k) plan (the “defined contribution plan” or “DC plan,” applicable for state employees hired on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Polkton Charter Township v. PellegromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API