Legal Opinion
Askenazi v. Hymil Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated July 10, 1998, as granted the cross motion of the third-party defendants to preclude her from presenting expert testimony regarding the flammability of any fabric.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
As a result of the plaintiff’s failure to comply with a conditional order of preclusion dated February 20, 1998, that conditional order became absolute (see, Michaud v City of New…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michaud v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Clissuras v. Concord Village Owners Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Felicciardi v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mann v. DachelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenkinson v. NaccaratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Kepple v. J. Hill AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Liotti v. RukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Tae Chool Ha v. B.H.N.V. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000