Legal Opinion

Tae Chool Ha v. B.H.N.V. Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated July 2, 1999, which, in effect, granted its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint only to the extent of marking the case inactive and directing that the plaintiff would not be permitted to testify at trial unless he submitted to an examination before trial at least sixty days prior to trial.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof directing that the plaintiff would not be permitted to testify at trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michaud v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Barriga v. SapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. DiPietro v. DuhlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Askenazi v. Hymil Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Williams v. New Style Limousine, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fujah v. V-M Auto Refinishing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API