Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Faubus

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 1961No. 5-2475PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.

The appellant, as a citizen and taxpayer, brought this suit for a judgment declaring Act 442 of 1961 to be unconstitutional. The original defendants were the Governor, the State Treasurer, and the members of the State Construction Board created by the act in question. Yarious state agencies, beneficiaries of the act, were permitted to intervene in the case. The appellant’s principal allegations of unconstitutionality are that the act is an omnibus bill of the type prohibited by Article 5, Section 30, of the constitution, and that the act delegates…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Fletcher v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1868
  4. Black v. Oklahoma Funding Bond CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Ward v. Bailey, GovernorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Panitz v. Comptroller of the Treasury & State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Arkansas Motor Carriers Ass'n. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Reid v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Clinton v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API