Legal Opinion
Panitz v. Comptroller of the Treasury & State Treasurer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 13, 1967No. [No. 125, September Term, 1967 (Adv.).]PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
This Court by per curiam order held on June 14, 1967, that Ch. 142 of the Laws of 1967, sometimes referred to as the Agnew-Hughes-Lee bill (or the amended Cooper-Hughes bill) was invalid and ineffective as a Supplementary Appropriation Bill but was prima facie valid as other legislation. The grounds for holding Ch. 142 to be invalid and ineffective as an appropriation bill were stated in the order to be that the enactment violated :
“the requirement of Section 52 (8) of Article III of the Constitution of Maryland that every appropriation not made by the Budget Bill 'shall be embodied in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ReitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- McKeldin v. SteedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Jensen v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bremer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Judy v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Mayor of Baltimore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Maryland Action for Foster Children, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.