Legal Opinion

Ward v. Bailey, Governor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 17, 1939No. 4-5221PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

Appellant is a citizen and taxpayer owning a refunding bond issued by the state under authority of act 11, approved February 12, 1934. He asserts invalidity of act 223, approved March 10, 1939. Appellees are the Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Treasurer of State, State Bank Commissioner, and State Comptroller, constituting the State Investment Board. The chancellor sustained a demurrer to the complaint.

Specifically, it is alleged that act 223 [hereafter referred to as the act] is ineffectual because enacted after appropriations aggregating $2,500,000 had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  4. Collins v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Pulaski County v. CapleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Halbert v. Helena-West Helena Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Miles v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Kirksey v. City of Ft. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API