Ward v. Bailey, Governor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.
Appellant is a citizen and taxpayer owning a refunding bond issued by the state under authority of act 11, approved February 12, 1934. He asserts invalidity of act 223, approved March 10, 1939. Appellees are the Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Treasurer of State, State Bank Commissioner, and State Comptroller, constituting the State Investment Board. The chancellor sustained a demurrer to the complaint.
Specifically, it is alleged that act 223 [hereafter referred to as the act] is ineffectual because enacted after appropriations aggregating $2,500,000 had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Little Rock v. North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Collins v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Pulaski County v. CapleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Halbert v. Helena-West Helena Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Miles v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Kirksey v. City of Ft. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.