Legal Opinion

Reid v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1977No. 76-134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hardy W. Croxton, Special Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s action challenging the constitutionality of Act 101 Oof the General Assembly, 1976, because it is contrary to the terms of Article 5, Section 30 of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas. Article 5, Section 30 provides:

“General and Special Appropriations. The General Appropriation Bill shall embrace nothing but appropriations for the ordinary expenses of the executive, legislative and judicial departments of the state; all other appropriations shall be made by separate bills, each embracing but one subject.”

The parties have stipulated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Cottrell v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Neeley v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Mississippi State Tax Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. First National Bank v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API