Legal Opinion
Helm v. Bollman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1959No. Civ. 9733PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNS, J. pro tern. *
Plaintiffs appeal from a money judgment in their favor against the defendants Fred Boll-man and Larry Brown, doing business as Bollman and Brown Logging Company, in an action brought to recover damages arising by reason of trespass by said defendants upon land owned by plaintiffs and the removing therefrom of certain timber without the consent and permission of the plaintiffs.
The trial court found that the defendants trespassed upon plaintiffs’ land and removed certain timber of the reasonable value of $2,911.20; that the trespass was not wilful or malicious; that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Alco Express Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Karen deLAURIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Lester G. Warrenbrock, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.