Legal Opinion
Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Levine
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1985No. C6-84-1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant attempted to appeal per diem medical assistance rate adjustments before the Department of Human Services (DHS). The DHS refused to allow the appeal because it was filed more than 30 days after notification of the adjustments. See Minn.R. 9510.0140 (1983). Appellant’s suit for declaratory and injunctive relief was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We granted discretionary review and reverse.
FACTS
Appellant operated a nursing home in Grand Rapids, Minnesota. Appellant participated in the medical assistance program, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Christgau v. FineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Department of Employment Security v. Minnesota Drug Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Larson v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Contested Case of Emmanuel Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- E.N. v. Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Diedrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Res Investment Co. v. County of DakotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.