Legal Opinion

Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1992No. C4-91-1311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Relator argues that this action should be barred by laches and that the Commissioner of Human Services misconstrued the applicable cost reimbursement provisions. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc., operated a nursing home, participating in the State Medical Assistance Program (MA). A significant portion of the nursing home was dedicated exclusively to physical therapy which, while available to residents of the nursing home, was primarily provided to non-residents on an outpatient basis. Leisure Hills accepted money from the state under the MA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Klapmeier v. Town of Center of Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stenehjem, ex rel. v. National Audubon Society, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Weed v. Commissioner of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Stenehjem, ex rel. v. National Audubon Society, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API