Legal Opinion

Res Investment Co. v. County of Dakota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1992No. C7-92-1488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellants sought a writ of mandamus, a writ of certiorari and a declaratory judgment challenging the Dakota County Board of Commissioners’ refusal to consider their applications for abatement of property taxes under Minn.Stat. § 375.192, subd. 2 (1990). The Board’s refusal was based upon its “policy” to consider abatement applications only for the current tax year. Appellants’ applications were for previous years.

The trial court denied appellants relief and determined the Board had implied authority to limit its jurisdiction to consider applications. The trial court also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Desnick v. MastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Fred O. Watson Co. v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. County of Lake v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Prall v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Herrmann v. McMenomy & SeversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Mid-City Hotel Associates v. Hennepin County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Op. Atty. Gen. 59a-32 (Cr. Ref. 441h 477b-34), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2002
  4. Op. Atty. Gen. 59a-32 (Cr. Ref. 441h 477b-34), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API