Legal Opinion

Crumley v. Hickman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1884No. 10,700PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This case comes to this court on a reserved *389question of law growing out of the dismissal by the trial court of the appellants’ appeal from certain proceedings, the nature of which does not appear, had before the county board. The appeal was dismissed on the appellees’ written motiou, supported by two affidavits. The motion and affidavit appear, in the transcript in connection with the order-books entries made by the clerk, but are omitted at their proper place in the bill of exceptions. The clerk there refers to them at the previous pages in the transcript, where they are copied.

The motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Colee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Stewart v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kimball v. LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cauldwell v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cottrell v. Ætna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Washington Ice Co. v. LayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Norton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API