Legal Opinion

Riley v. TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 11, 1995No. Civ. A. AW-93-3518PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Kimberly Riley and Laura Carros commenced this action against their former employer, Technical and Management Services Corporation (“TAMSCO”). They contend that TAMSCO discriminated against them on the basis of their gender and retaliated against them for raising discrimination and sexual harassment concerns in violation of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Presently before the Court is TAMSCO’s motion for summary judgment. A hearing was held on this motion on January 9,1995. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Crosten v. KamaufDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  3. Young v. Giant Food Stores, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Allen v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  5. Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API