Legal Opinion

Bowie v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1972No. 48, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The broad complaint of the appellant, Wright Weedon Bowie, is that he made a “deal” with the State and the State broke the bargain. The general cry of “Foul” takes on legal specificity in the parallel but distinct contentions 1) that an implicit grant of immunity foreclosed prosecution of the instant cases and 2) that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was infringed. Both claims were denied by Judge Samuel W. Barrick at a pretrial hearing in the Circuit Court for Frederick County, and both are here appealed. The denial of the latter is properly before us. The denial of the former was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. United States v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Munn v. McKelveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API