Legal Opinion

Surina v. Buckalew

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1981No. 5205, 5462PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

The issue presented by these proceedings is whether, in the absence of any authorizing statute on the subject, a promise of immunity by a state prosecutor and court may be used to compel testimony from a witness in a criminal proceeding, despite the witness’s claim of the privilege against self-incrimination. We conclude that under proper circumstances, the testimony so immunized may be compelled.

In regard to the Surina appeal, one Rick Greenwell was charged with the robbery of a gas station, allegedly committed with an unidentified black individual on October…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  5. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API