Legal Opinion

Cooley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2000No. 93-413LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ claim for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the regulatory taking of real property. Plaintiffs’ claim is based upon the denial of an application for a wetlands fill permit under § 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344 (1993)(CWA)1 For the reasons stated below, the court finds for the plaintiffs.

FACTS

Plaintiffs, Helen L. Cooley, William O. Cooley, and the 7C Company, purchased a thirty-three acre parcel of land located at the Northwest intersection of Highway 10 and Hanson Boulevard in Coon Rapids,…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Helen L. Cooley, William O. Cooley, and the 7c Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Christian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Beekwilder v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API