Legal Opinion
Parker v. Artery
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1995No. 93-243PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
The injured parties in a tort action bring this appeal. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and a substantial award of compensatory damages in favor of the injured parties. However, the injured parties contend pretrial rulings of the district court and a variety of procedural errors unfairly restricted the presentation of facts to the jury. The injured parties also claim they were denied the full measure of their damages.
We affirm.
I. ISSUES
Among the issues on appeal, the injured parties insist they should have been permitted to inform the jury that an intoxicated tortfeasor ran…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Weaver v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- G.J.D. ex rel. G.J.D. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Kraft Power Corp. v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- GJD BY GJD v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- RME Petroleum Co. v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.