Legal Opinion

Avery v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1994No. A94A0004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Presiding Judge.

Like the plaintiff in Jakobsen v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 260 Ga. 565 (397 SE2d 435) (1990), plaintiffs, Avery and others, seek to prevent Colonial Pipeline Company and Plantation Pipeline Company from removing trees, vegetation, and overhang from petroleum pipeline easements which traverse real properties owned by plaintiffs in DeKalb and Fulton Counties. They also seek declaratory judgment, to quiet title, and monetary damages. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of defendants, ruling that they can remove trees, vegetation, and overhang; it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newport Timber Corp. v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Winchester v. Sun Valley-Atlanta AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Jakobsen v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Cowart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. MusselmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY v. Duke EnergyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  4. Atlanta Independent School System v. WardlowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API