TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY v. Duke Energy
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HOCHBERG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The Court retains diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. The Court has reviewed the submissions of the parties and considers the motion on the papers pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78 together with pertinent portions of the oral argument on April 26, 2005.
BACKGROUND
A. Factual History 1
Plaintiffs are individual residential homeowners, who reside on Fountain Av enue, a one-block long street in the Township of Piscataway, New Jersey. Defendants are Duke Energy Operating…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.