Legal Opinion

Sohl v. Evans

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1901No. 3,883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Hamilton Circuit Court; J. A. Roberts, Judge. Action by James L. Evans and another against Aaron Sohl and others for money had and received, and in attachment and garnishment. From a judgment for plaintiffs, Aaron Sohl appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

J ames L. Evans and Aaron D. Booth brought their action against Aaron Sohl and a number of other persons, all of whom, except one J. E. Eubanks, are appellants; the complaint showing a cause of action in favor of the plaintiffs against said Aaron Sohl for money had and received by him for the use of the plaintiffs, which he converted to his own use, in the sum of $3,000; the complaint being accompanied by an affidavit in attachment and in garnishment against the other defendants, and by an undertaking in attachment. Afterward James L. Evans, and later Herbert H. Stephenson and John C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gregory v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Abshire v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. GueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. National Surety Co. v. ButtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Smith v. HibbenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Bosstick v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Hernly v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API