Smith v. Hibben
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Hamilton Circuit Court; Meade Vestal, Judge. Action by Harold B. Hibben and others against John H. Smith and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPelt, J.
The appellees, Harold B. Hibben, Thomas E. Hibben, and Louis Hollweg, have entered a special appearance herein and moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court has not acquired jurisdiction of the appeal. The substance of the motion is as follows: That the suit was *440a joint action against appellants, John PI. Smith and Beecher W. Bennett, and one George O. Benham, and the judgment in favor of appellees was a joint judgment against all three of the defendants; that Benham did not appeal and no notice of the appeal was served on him by appellants, Smith and Bennett, and filed with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Abshire v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fort v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gainey v. HaslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Walker v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916